Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFotirić Akšić, Milica
dc.contributor.authorMačukanović-Jocić, Marina
dc.contributor.authorRadošević, Radenko
dc.contributor.authorNedić, Nebojša
dc.contributor.authorGašić, Uroš
dc.contributor.authorTosti, Tomislav
dc.contributor.authorTešić, Živoslav
dc.contributor.authorMeland, Mekjell
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T07:08:56Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T07:08:56Z
dc.date.created2023-05-15T15:35:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-25
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3082030
dc.description.abstractThe topography and morpho-anatomical characteristics of floral nectaries and the chemical analysis of nectar have been studied in seven pear cultivars with different susceptibility to Erwinia amylovora. The susceptible cultivarWilliams, the moderately resistant cultivars Bella di guigno, Poire de Cure and the low susceptible cultivar Alexander Lucas originated from Pyrus communis, while highly resistant cultivars Chojuro and Nijisseiki from P. pyraster and Kieffer as interspecies hybrid P. communis x P. pyraster were included in this experiment and studied for the first time. Large differences in size and structure of the nectaries were observed in these seven pear cultivars. The epidermal cells were with cuticle being more or less striated in Alexander Lucas, Kieffer and Williams. Resistant cultivars had a narrow, elongated cell shape of epidermal cells while those susceptible had an isodiametric. Stomata were mesomorphic in all cultivars except in Poire de Cure and Williams, being slightly xeromorphic since they were situated in deep hollows. Guard cells of the modified stomata were much larger in resistant cultivars. Hypanthium cells were larger in resistant compared to susceptible cultivars. The most abundant sugars were glucose, fructose, sorbitol and sucrose in nectar of all studied pear cultivars. The resistant cultivars (Chojuro, Kieffer and Nijisseiki) had a ~2-fold higher level of sorbitol and galactose, ~2.2-fold higher isomaltose, ~2.7-fold turanose, ~3.35-fold maltose, ~4.4-fold melibiose and ~12.7-fold higher melesitose compared to susceptible cultivars. The sum of quantified phenolic acids varied from 0.049 (Williams) up to 4.074 µg CAE/mL (Kieffer), while flavonoid glycosides levels ranged from 1.224 (Williams) up to 11.686 µg RE/mL (Nijisseiki). In the nectar of the resistant cultivars, rutin, apigetrin, together with patuletin and luteolin glycosides were detected but not in susceptible cultivars, which could be considered as the markers of resistance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.titleThe Morpho-Anatomy of Nectaries and Chemical Composition of Nectar in Pear Cultivars with Different Susceptibility to Erwinia amlylovoraen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Morpho-Anatomy of Nectaries and Chemical Composition of Nectar in Pear Cultivars with Different Susceptibility to Erwinia amlylovoraen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalHorticulturaeen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/horticulturae9040424
dc.identifier.cristin2147655
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 244510en_US
dc.source.articlenumber424en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel