Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPuschmann, Oskar
dc.contributor.authorEiter, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorFjellstad, Wendy Jane
dc.contributor.authorKrøgli, Svein Olav
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T07:02:30Z
dc.date.available2018-09-03T07:02:30Z
dc.date.created2018-08-31T08:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationNIBIO POP. 2018, 4 (24), .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2464-1170
dc.identifier.issn2464-1170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2560429
dc.description.abstractWhen ground level photography is to be used in landscape monitoring, it is important to record when, where, how and possibly even why the photographs are taken. Standardisation enables better repeat photography in the future and maximises comparability of photos over time. We used a Cultural Environment protected by law on the peninsula of Bygdøy,Oslo municipality, as a study area to document advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to the first round of landscape photography for long-term monitoring.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.titlePreparing Future Flashbacks – Repeat Photography as a Method in Landscape Monitoringnb_NO
dc.title.alternativePreparing Future Flashbacks – Repeat Photography as a Method in Landscape Monitoringnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber6nb_NO
dc.source.volume4nb_NO
dc.source.journalNIBIO POPnb_NO
dc.source.issue24nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1605696
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record