Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMageroy, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Erik
dc.contributor.authorLångström, Bo
dc.contributor.authorBorg-Karlson, Anna-Karin
dc.contributor.authorSolheim, Halvor
dc.contributor.authorBjörklund, Niklas
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Tao
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Axel
dc.contributor.authorFossdal, Carl Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorKrokene, Paal
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T07:53:14Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T07:53:14Z
dc.date.created2019-11-20T09:02:29Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-01
dc.identifier.citationPlant, Cell and Environment. 2020, 43 (2), 420-430.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-7791
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2681894
dc.description.abstractPlants can form an immunological memory known as defense priming, whereby exposure to a priming stimulus enables quicker or stronger response to subsequent attack by pests and pathogens. Such priming of inducible defenses provides increased protection and reduces allocation costs of defense. Defense priming has been widely studied for short‐lived model plants such as Arabidopsis, but little is known about this phenomenon in long‐lived plants like spruce. We compared the effects of pretreatment with sublethal fungal inoculations or application of the phytohormone methyl jasmonate (MeJA) on the resistance of 48‐year‐old Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees to mass attack by a tree‐killing bark beetle beginning 35 days later. Bark beetles heavily infested and killed untreated trees but largely avoided fungus‐inoculated trees and MeJA‐treated trees. Quantification of defensive terpenes at the time of bark beetle attack showed fungal inoculation induced 91‐fold higher terpene concentrations compared with untreated trees, whereas application of MeJA did not significantly increase terpenes. These results indicate that resistance in fungus‐inoculated trees is a result of direct induction of defenses, whereas resistance in MeJA‐treated trees is due to defense priming. This work extends our knowledge of defense priming from model plants to an ecologically important tree species.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltden_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePriming of inducible defenses protects Norway spruce against tree-killing bark beetlesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber420-430en_US
dc.source.volume43en_US
dc.source.journalPlant, Cell and Environmenten_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pce.13661
dc.identifier.cristin1749677
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 249958en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 249920en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal