Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMaltamo, Matti
dc.contributor.authorHauglin, Marius
dc.contributor.authorNæsset, Erik
dc.contributor.authorGobakken, Terje
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T11:21:21Z
dc.date.available2020-01-13T11:21:21Z
dc.date.created2019-11-04T12:08:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-07
dc.identifier.citationSilva Fennica. 2019, 53 (3), .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0037-5330
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2635937
dc.description.abstractAccurately positioned single-tree data obtained from a cut-to-length harvester were used as training harvester plot data for k-nearest neighbor (k-nn) stem diameter distribution modelling applying airborne laser scanning (ALS) information as predictor variables. Part of the same harvester data were also used for stand-level validation where the validation units were stands including all the harvester plots on a systematic grid located within each individual stand. In the validation all harvester plots within a stand and also the neighboring stands located closer than 200 m were excluded from the training data when predicting for plots of a particular stand. We further compared different training harvester plot sizes, namely 200 m2, 400 m2, 900 m2 and 1600 m2. Due to this setup the number of considered stands and the areas within the stands varied between the different harvester plot sizes. Our data were from final fellings in Akershus County in Norway and consisted of altogether 47 stands dominated by Norway spruce. We also had ALS data from the area. We concentrated on estimating characteristics of Norway spruce but due to the k-nn approach, species-wise estimates and stand totals as a sum over species were considered as well. The results showed that in the most accurate cases stand-level merchantable total volume could be estimated with RMSE values smaller than 9% of the mean. This value can be considered as highly accurate. Also the fit of the stem diameter distribution assessed by a variant of Reynold’s error index showed values smaller than 0.2 which are superior to those found in the previous studies. The differences between harvester plot sizes were generally small, showing most accurate results for the training harvester plot sizes 200 m2 and 400 m2.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcut-to length harvesternb_NO
dc.subjectGPSnb_NO
dc.subjectLidarnb_NO
dc.subjectmerchantable volumenb_NO
dc.subjecttree listnb_NO
dc.titleEstimating stand level stem diameter distribution utilizing harvester data and airborne laser scanningnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber19nb_NO
dc.source.volume53nb_NO
dc.source.journalSilva Fennicanb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.14214/sf.10075
dc.identifier.cristin1743796
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 281140nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 225329nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7677,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameDivisjon for skog og utmark
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal