Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBloem, Esther
dc.contributor.authorForquet, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorSøiland, Astri
dc.contributor.authorBinley, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Helen Kristine
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T09:22:36Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T09:22:36Z
dc.date.created2021-01-23T16:38:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-14
dc.identifier.citationNear Surface Geophysics. 2020, 18 (4), 399-412.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1569-4445
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727325
dc.description.abstractTo improve risk assessment, control and treatment strategies of contaminated sites, we require accurate methods for monitoring solute transport and infiltration in the unsaturated zone. Highly spatio‐temporal heterogeneous infiltration during snowmelt increases the risk of contaminating the groundwater in areas where de‐icing chemicals are required for winter maintenance of roads and runways. The objective of this study is to quantify how the different processes occurring during snowmelt infiltration of contaminated meltwater affect bulk electrical resistivity. Field experiments conducted at Moreppen experimental lysimeter trench are combined with heterogeneous unsaturated soil modelling. The experimental site is located next to Oslo airport, Gardermoen, Norway, where large amounts of de‐icing chemicals are used to remove snow and ice every winter. Bromide, an inactive tracer, and the de‐icing chemical propylene glycol were applied to the snow cover prior to the onset of snowmelt, and their percolation through the unsaturated zone was monitored with water sampling from 37 suction cups. At the same time, cross‐borehole time‐lapse electrical resistivity measurements were recorded along with measurements of soil water tension and temperature. Images of two‐dimensional (2D) bulk resistivity profiles were determined and were temperature corrected, to compensate for the change in soil temperature throughout the melting period. By using fitted parameters of petrophysical relations for the Moreppen soil, the tensiometer data gave insight into the contribution of water saturation on the changes in bulk resistivity, while water samples provided the contribution to the bulk resistivity from salt concentrations. The experimental data were compared with numerical simulation of the same experimental conditions in a heterogeneous unsaturated soil and used to quantify the uncertainty caused by the non‐consistent resolutions of the different methods, and to increase our understanding of the resistivity signal measured with time‐lapse electrical resistivity tomography. The work clearly illustrates the importance of ground truthing in multiple locations to obtain an accurate description of the contaminant transport.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTowards understanding time-lapse electrical resistivity signals measured during contaminated snowmelt infiltrationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber399-412en_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.journalNear Surface Geophysicsen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nsg.12112
dc.identifier.cristin1877620
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 197378en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/212663en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal