Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStober, Dina
dc.contributor.authorSuškevičs, Monika
dc.contributor.authorEiter, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorMartinat, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorBuchecker, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T08:38:30Z
dc.date.available2021-06-21T08:38:30Z
dc.date.created2020-10-12T10:25:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Research & Social Science. 2021, 71 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2760325
dc.description.abstractThere is widespread agreement that society must urgently go over to renewable energy and that effective participation is crucial for a sustainable transition. Recent literature highlights that the quality of participatory planning is decisive for the acceptance of renewable energy technologies. However, social science research on the issue is dominated by single case studies and the quality of the participatory processes has been rarely studied across wider regional contexts. We present the results of a comparative qualitative inventory of innovative practices from 25 projects in 12 countries in three supra-national European regions. We assessed participation quality according to three analytical dimensions: rationale, inclusiveness, and participation level. An instrumental rationale, broad inclusiveness, and a participation level of consulting or informing was a combination that was commonly perceived as an innovative participatory practice in most regional contexts. We found a tendency towards more advanced practices in Western Europe, compared to Southern, and Eastern Europe. However, practices that were considered to be innovative in the latter regions still provide important lessons within their geographical contexts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.titleWhat is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projectsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber13en_US
dc.source.volume71en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Research & Social Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2020.101804
dc.identifier.cristin1838804
dc.relation.projectCOST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology): TU1401en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 194051en_US
dc.source.articlenumber101804en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel