Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlfredsen, Gry
dc.contributor.authorBrischke, Christian
dc.contributor.authorMarais, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorStein, Robert F.A.
dc.contributor.authorZimmer, Katrin
dc.contributor.authorHumar, Miha
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T10:39:04Z
dc.date.available2021-10-11T10:39:04Z
dc.date.created2021-08-24T12:27:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-29
dc.identifier.citationForests. 2021, 12 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1999-4907
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2788993
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the performance of new wood-based products, reference wood species with known performances are included in laboratory and field trials. However, different wood species vary in their durability performance, and there will also be a within-species variation. The primary aim of this paper was to compare the material resistance against decay fungi and moisture performance of three European reference wood species, i.e., Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris), Norway spruce (Picea abies), and European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Wood material was collected from 43 locations all over Europe and exposed to brown rot (Rhodonia placenta), white rot (Trametes versicolor) or soft rot fungi. In addition, five different moisture performance characteristics were analyzed. The main results were the two factors accounting for the wetting ability (kwa) and the inherent protective properties of wood (kinh), factors for conversion between Norway spruce vs. Scots pine sapwood or European beech for the three decay types and four moisture tests, and material resistance dose (DRd) per wood species. The data illustrate that the differences between the three European reference wood species were minor, both with regard to decay and moisture performance. The results also highlight the importance of defined boundaries for density and annual ring width when comparing materials within and between experiments. It was concluded that with the factors obtained, existing, and future test data, where only one or two of the mentioned reference species were used, can be transferred to models and prediction tools that use another of the reference speciesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPI, Basel, Switzerlanden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleModelling the Material Resistance of Wood—Part 1: Utilizing Durability Test Data Based on Different Reference Wood Speciesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber19en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalForestsen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/f12050558
dc.identifier.cristin1928299
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 297899en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/773324en_US
dc.source.articlenumber558en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal