Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKvakkestad, Valborg
dc.contributor.authorSteiro, Åsmund Lægreid
dc.contributor.authorVatn, Arild
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T14:43:14Z
dc.date.available2021-10-14T14:43:14Z
dc.date.created2021-09-17T09:11:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-30
dc.identifier.citationAgriculture. 2021, 11 (9), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2823124
dc.description.abstractIntegrated pest management (IPM) was introduced in the 1960s as a response to increasing pesticide use and has since evolved from being understood mainly as an economic issue to also including environmental and human health considerations. The EU has made IPM mandatory for all farmers through the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive (SUD). Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper examines how Norwegian cereal farmers have responded to this requirement. The qualitative results show that most farmers have an understanding of IPM that goes beyond economic considerations only. The quantitative results display that farmers’ intrinsic motivation for IPM changed after introduction of the SUD. There is increased emphasis on using methods other than spraying, producing grain without traces of pesticides, and preventing pesticide resistance. Farmers’ self-reported knowledge of IPM increased, and 41% of farmers stated that they use IPM to a greater extent than before the SUD was introduced. These results demonstrate that mandatory IPM requirements have been a successful strategy for increasing farmers use of IPM in Norway. Clearer IPM provisions and increased intrinsic motivation for IPM among farmers will, however, be important to reduce the risks from pesticides further.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPI, Basel, Switzerlanden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePesticide Policies and Farm Behavior: The Introduction of Regulations for Integrated Pest Managementen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalAgricultureen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agriculture11090828
dc.identifier.cristin1935197
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 221394en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 244526en_US
dc.source.articlenumber828en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal