Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPiccoli, Ilaria
dc.contributor.authorSeehusen, Till
dc.contributor.authorBussell, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorVizitu, Olga
dc.contributor.authorCalciu, Irina
dc.contributor.authorBerti, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBörjesson, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorKirchmann, Holger
dc.contributor.authorKätterer, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSartori, Felice
dc.contributor.authorStoate, Chris
dc.contributor.authorCrotty, Felicity
dc.contributor.authorPanagea, Ioanna S.
dc.contributor.authorAlaoui, Abdallah
dc.contributor.authorBolinder, Martin A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-20T11:28:36Z
dc.date.available2022-07-20T11:28:36Z
dc.date.created2022-03-28T18:01:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-02
dc.identifier.citationLand. 2022, 11 (2), 1-26.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2073-445X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3007222
dc.description.abstractSoil compaction (SC) is a major threat for agriculture in Europe that affects many ecosystem functions, such as water and air circulation in soils, root growth, and crop production. Our objective was to present the results from five short-term (<5 years) case studies located along the north–south and east–west gradients and conducted within the SoilCare project using soil-improving cropping systems (SICSs) for mitigating topsoil and subsoil SC. Two study sites (SSs) focused on natural subsoil (˃25 cm) compaction using subsoiling tillage treatments to depths of 35 cm (Sweden) and 60 cm (Romania). The other SSs addressed both topsoil and subsoil SC (˃25 cm, Norway and United Kingdom; ˃30 cm, Italy) using deep-rooted bio-drilling crops and different tillage types or a combination of both. Each SS evaluated the effectiveness of the SICSs by measuring the soil physical properties, and we calculated SC indices. The SICSs showed promising results—for example, alfalfa in Norway showed good potential for alleviating SC (the subsoil density decreased from 1.69 to 1.45 g cm−1) and subsoiling at the Swedish SS improved root penetration into the subsoil by about 10 cm—but the effects of SICSs on yields were generally small. These case studies also reflected difficulties in implementing SICSs, some of which are under development, and we discuss methodological issues for measuring their effectiveness. There is a need for refining these SICSs and for evaluating their longer-term effect under a wider range of pedoclimatic conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPI, Basel, Switzerlanden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleOpportunities for mitigating soil compaction in Europe—Case studies from the SoilCare project using soil-improving cropping systemsen_US
dc.title.alternativeOpportunities for mitigating soil compaction in Europe—Case studies from the SoilCare project using soil-improving cropping systemsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber26en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalLanden_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/land11020223
dc.identifier.cristin2013124
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/677407en_US
dc.source.articlenumber223en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal