Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Line
dc.contributor.authorHenriksen, Marie Vestergaard
dc.contributor.authorWehn, Sølvi
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-31T13:37:09Z
dc.date.available2022-10-31T13:37:09Z
dc.date.created2022-10-24T14:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-28
dc.identifier.citationEcological Solutions and Evidence. 2022, 3 (3), 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2688-8319
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3029166
dc.description.abstractConservation of species associated with semi-natural grasslands, a threatened habitat, is dependent on their ability to disperse between the few and fragmented patches remaining in the landscape. To maintain metapopulations dynamics and reduce the risk of regional extinction, it is essential to know whether other, more widespread, habitats can act as alternative habitat for the biodiversity associated with threatened habitats. Here, we study how four widespread habitat types in boreal landscapes—forest, permanent grassland, abandoned grassland and road verge—can contribute to the conservation of plant species found in semi-natural grasslands which is a species-rich ecosystem important for plant and pollinator diversity that has experienced extensive reduction, fragmentation and isolation. We compare richness of all vascular plants, insect-pollinated plants and semi-natural grassland specialists among habitat types in two regions is Norway where semi-natural grasslands are few and fragmented. Based on overlap in community composition and local species richness, road verges were the most promising alternative habitat for both insect-pollinated plants and semi-natural grasslands specialists. Several habitat specialist species were, however, only found in semi-natural grasslands and, for these species, no other habitat can be considered suitable as alternative habitat. Our results highlight that a holistic management perspective is needed to maintain biodiversity associated with semi-natural grasslands. Thus, both the protection of remaining patches of the primary, threatened habitats as well as management of widespread, alternative habitats in the landscape should be prioritized.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Societyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe contribution of alternative habitats for conservation of plant species associated with threatened semi-natural grasslandsen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe contribution of alternative habitats for conservation of plant species associated with threatened semi-natural grasslandsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalEcological Solutions and Evidenceen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2688-8319.12183
dc.identifier.cristin2064486
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 280715en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 230278en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere12183en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal