dc.contributor.author | Puschmann, Oskar | |
dc.contributor.author | Eiter, Sebastian | |
dc.contributor.author | Fjellstad, Wendy Jane | |
dc.contributor.author | Krøgli, Svein Olav | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-03T07:02:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-03T07:02:30Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-08-31T08:31:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | NIBIO POP. 2018, 4 (24), . | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 2464-1170 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2464-1170 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2560429 | |
dc.description.abstract | When ground level photography is to be used in landscape monitoring, it is important to record when, where, how and possibly even why the photographs are taken. Standardisation enables better repeat photography in the future and maximises comparability of photos over time. We used a Cultural Environment protected by law on the peninsula of Bygdøy,Oslo municipality, as a study area to document advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to the first round of landscape photography for long-term monitoring. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.title | Preparing Future Flashbacks – Repeat Photography as a Method in Landscape Monitoring | nb_NO |
dc.title.alternative | Preparing Future Flashbacks – Repeat Photography as a Method in Landscape Monitoring | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 6 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 4 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | NIBIO POP | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 24 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1605696 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.fulltext | | |