Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAkbari, Vahid
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Svein
dc.contributor.authorPuliti, Stefano
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T08:47:31Z
dc.date.available2021-10-08T08:47:31Z
dc.date.created2021-09-13T18:28:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-15
dc.identifier.citationV. Akbari, S. Solberg and S. Puliti, "Multitemporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Images for Characterization and Discrimination of Young Forest Stands Under Regeneration in Norway," in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 14, pp. 5049-5063, 2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-1404
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2788634
dc.description.abstractThere is a need for mapping of forest areas with young stands under regeneration in Norway, as a basis for conducting tending, or precommercial thinning (PCT), whenever necessary. The main objective of this article is to show the potential of multitemporal Sentinel-1 (S-1) and Sentinel-2 (S-2) data for characterization and detection of forest stands under regeneration. We identify the most powerful radar and optical features for discrimination of forest stands under regeneration versus other forest stands. A number of optical and radar features derived from multitemporal S-1 and S-2 data were used for the class separability and cross-correlation analysis. The analysis was performed on forest resource maps consisting of the forest development classes and age in two study sites from south-eastern Norway. Important features were used to train the classical random forest (RF) classification algorithm. A comparative study of performance of the algorithm was used in three cases: I) using only S-1 features, II) using only S-2 optical bands, and III) using combination of S-1 and S-2 features. RF classification results pointed to increased class discrimination when using S-1 and S-2 data in relation to S-1 or S-2 data only. The study shows that forest stands under regeneration in the height interval for PCT can be detected with a detection rate of 91% and F-1 score of 73.2% in case III as most accurate, while tree density and broadleaf fraction could be estimated with coefficient of determination ( R2 ) of about 0.70 and 0.80, respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMultitemporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Images for Characterization and Discrimination of Young Forest Stands Under Regeneration in Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber5049-5063en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3073101
dc.identifier.cristin1933926
dc.relation.projectCopernicus Program in Norway: 51567en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal