Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRäty, Janne
dc.contributor.authorBreidenbach, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorHauglin, Marius
dc.contributor.authorAstrup, Rasmus Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T12:28:47Z
dc.date.available2022-01-25T12:28:47Z
dc.date.created2021-11-24T13:10:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-25
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2021, 105 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1569-8432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2839225
dc.description.abstractButt rot (BR) damage of a tree results from a decay caused by a pathogenic fungus. BR damages associated with Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) account for considerable economic losses in timber production across the northern hemisphere. While information on BR damages is critical for optimal decision-making in forest management, maps of BR damages are typically lacking in forest information systems. Timber volume damaged by BR was predicted at the stand-level in Norway using harvester information of 186,026 stems (clear-cuts), remotely sensed, and environmental data (e.g. climate and terrain characteristics). This study utilized Random Forests models with two sets of predictor variables: (1) predictor variables available after harvest (theoretical case) and (2) predictor variables available prior to harvest (mapping case). Our findings showed that forest attributes characterizing the maturity of forest, such as remote sensing-based height, harvested timber volume and quadratic mean diameter at breast height, were among the most important predictor variables. Remotely sensed predictor variables obtained from airborne laser scanning data and Sentinel-2 imagery were more important than the environmental variables. The theoretical case with a leave-stand-out cross-validation resulted in an RMSE of 11.4 m3 · ha−1 (pseudo-R2: 0.66) whereas the mapping case resulted in a pseudo-R2 of 0.60. When spatially distinct clusters of harvested forest stands were used as units in the cross-validation, the RMSE value and pseudo-R2 associated with the mapping case were 15.6 m3 · ha−1 and 0.37, respectively. The findings associated with the different cross-validation schemes indicated that the knowledge about the BR status of spatially close stands is of high importance for obtaining satisfactory error rates in the mapping of BR damages.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePrediction of butt rot volume in Norway spruce forest stands using harvester, remotely sensed and environmental dataen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.volume105en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jag.2021.102624
dc.identifier.cristin1958394
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 281140en_US
dc.source.articlenumber102624en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal