Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDong, Rui
dc.contributor.authorMiao, Yuxin
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xinbing
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Fei
dc.contributor.authorKusnierek, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T14:34:28Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T14:34:28Z
dc.date.created2022-02-04T12:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-17
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing. 2021, 13 (24), 1-20.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2982606
dc.description.abstractAccurate assessment of crop nitrogen (N) status and understanding the N demand are considered essential in precision N management. Chlorophyll fluorescence is unsusceptible to confounding signals from underlying bare soil and is closely related to plant photosynthetic activity. Therefore, fluorescence sensing is considered a promising technology for monitoring crop N status, even at an early growth stage. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential of using Multiplex® 3, a proximal canopy fluorescence sensor, to detect N status variability and to quantitatively estimate N status indicators at four key growth stages of maize. The sensor measurements were performed at different growth stages, and three different regression methods were compared to estimate plant N concentration (PNC), plant N uptake (PNU), and N nutrition index (NNI). The results indicated that the induced differences in maize plant N status were detectable as early as the V6 growth stage. The first method based on simple regression (SR) and the Multiplex sensor indices normalized by growing degree days (GDD) or N sufficiency index (NSI) achieved acceptable estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.73–0.87), showing a good potential of canopy fluorescence sensing for N status estimation. The second method using multiple linear regression (MLR), fluorescence indices and GDDs had the lowest modeling accuracy (R2 = 0.46–0.79). The third tested method used a non-linear regression approach in the form of random forest regression (RFR) based on multiple sensor indices and GDDs. This approach achieved the best estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.84–0.93) and the most accurate diagnostic result.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPI, Basel, Switzerlanden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCanopy fluorescence sensing for in-season maize nitrogen status diagnosisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-20en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs13245141
dc.identifier.cristin1997783
dc.source.articlenumber5141en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal