Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDong, Rui
dc.contributor.authorMiao, Yuxin
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xinbing
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Fei
dc.contributor.authorKusnierek, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T14:34:28Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T14:34:28Z
dc.date.created2022-02-04T12:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-17
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing. 2021, 13 (24), 1-20.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2982606
dc.description.abstractAccurate assessment of crop nitrogen (N) status and understanding the N demand are considered essential in precision N management. Chlorophyll fluorescence is unsusceptible to confounding signals from underlying bare soil and is closely related to plant photosynthetic activity. Therefore, fluorescence sensing is considered a promising technology for monitoring crop N status, even at an early growth stage. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential of using Multiplex® 3, a proximal canopy fluorescence sensor, to detect N status variability and to quantitatively estimate N status indicators at four key growth stages of maize. The sensor measurements were performed at different growth stages, and three different regression methods were compared to estimate plant N concentration (PNC), plant N uptake (PNU), and N nutrition index (NNI). The results indicated that the induced differences in maize plant N status were detectable as early as the V6 growth stage. The first method based on simple regression (SR) and the Multiplex sensor indices normalized by growing degree days (GDD) or N sufficiency index (NSI) achieved acceptable estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.73–0.87), showing a good potential of canopy fluorescence sensing for N status estimation. The second method using multiple linear regression (MLR), fluorescence indices and GDDs had the lowest modeling accuracy (R2 = 0.46–0.79). The third tested method used a non-linear regression approach in the form of random forest regression (RFR) based on multiple sensor indices and GDDs. This approach achieved the best estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.84–0.93) and the most accurate diagnostic result.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPI, Basel, Switzerlanden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCanopy fluorescence sensing for in-season maize nitrogen status diagnosisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-20en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs13245141
dc.identifier.cristin1997783
dc.source.articlenumber5141en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal