Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSaussure, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorHjelkrem, Anne-Grete Roer
dc.contributor.authorKlingen, Ingeborg
dc.contributor.authorMeadow, Richard
dc.contributor.authorHolst, Niels
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T13:16:36Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T13:16:36Z
dc.date.created2023-09-01T12:39:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-26
dc.identifier.citationSaussure, S., Hjelkrem, A.-G. R., Klingen, I., Meadow, R., & Holst, N. (2023). Are fungal epizootics a sign of successful biological control of cereal aphids? Journal of Pest Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.issn1612-4758
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3111136
dc.description.abstractPandora neoaphidis is a common entomopathogenic fungus on Sitobion avenae, which is an important aphid pest on cereals in Europe. Pandora neoaphidis is known to cause epizootics (i.e. an unusually high prevalence of infected hosts) and the rapid collapse of aphid populations. We developed a weather-driven mechanistic model of the winter wheat-S. avenae-P. neoaphidis system to simulate the dynamics from spring to harvest. Aphid immigration was fixed at a rate that would lead to a pest outbreak, if not controlled by the fungus. We estimated the biocontrol efficacy by running pair-wise simulations, one with and one without the fungus. Uncertainty in model parameters and variation in weather was included, resulting in a range of simulation outcomes, and a global sensitivity analysis was performed. We identified two key understudied parameters that require more extensive experimental data collection to better assess the fungus biocontrol, namely the fungus transmission efficiency and the decay of cadaver, which defines the time window for possible disease transmission. The parameters with the largest influence on the improvement in yield were the weather, the lethal time of exposed aphids, the fungus transmission efficiency, and the humidity threshold for fungus development, while the fungus inoculum in the chosen range (between 10 and 70% of immigrant aphids carrying the fungus) was less influential. The model suggests that epizootics occurring early, around Zadoks growth stage (GS) 61, would lead to successful biocontrol, while later epizootics (GS 73) were a necessary but insufficient condition for success. These model predictions were based on the prevalence of cadavers only, not of exposed (i.e. infected but yet non-symptomatic) aphids, which in practice would be costly to monitor. The model suggests that practical Integrated Pest Management could thus benefit from including the cadavers prevalence in a monitoring program. We argue for further research to experimentally estimate these cadaver thresholds.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAre fungal epizootics a sign of successful biological control of cereal aphids?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Pest Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10340-023-01674-w
dc.identifier.cristin2171665
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 244526en_US
dc.relation.projectCOST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology): FA1405en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal